Undecided - 02-13-2025 | Clear Admit DecisionWire

<< Back to DecisionWire

February 13, 2025 8:01am ET

Enrolled: Undecided

Admitted: USC / Marshall $

$90000

, UT Austin / McCombs $

$60000

, U. Washington / Foster $

$60000

Applied: USC / Marshall, UT Austin / McCombs, U. Washington / Foster

Entering Year: 2025

Post MBA Career: Technology

GRE: 334

Location: India

Notes:

Help me decide!

Why McC in my POV: Better ranked, historically does well (compared to Foster), well-rounded outcomes across industries (in case I don't get tech McC might help achieve Consulting goals).

Why Foster in my POV: Good outcomes in Tech (and I want to do tech); Less competition in Seattle; Better employment % for internationals in 2024.

Like (1)

Show Comments (3) Last: February 13, 2025

anon97226 Likes Earned: 0 OP here adding further context: 1. COA equal post scholarship. 2. Post-MBA goals: Marketing in Tech (PMM types); alternate: Consulting. 3. No preference between Austin/Seattle. (0)

eliot Verified User. Likes Earned: 1926 Congrats on your acceptances and scholarships. Both Foster and McCombs would provide you great access for a career in tech. The main difference is the geographic location. Foster would provide you great access to the Tech/Big Tech firms located near Seattle while McCombs would be great if you want to focus on the tech firms in Texas. Do you have a personal preference between Seattle vs Austin? (1)

mbadecisions25 Likes Earned: 0 @eliot Thank you. No preference as such. In which case, what would be your recommendation out of these two? Post-MBA goals: Marketing in Tech (PMM types); alternate: Consulting. (0)